Abstract Epistemic injustice sits at the intersection of ethics, epistemology, and social justice.Generally, this philosophical term describes when a person is wrongfully discredited as a knower; and within the clinical space, epistemic injustice is the underlying reason that some patient testimonies are valued above others.The following essay seek

Objective.To determine compliance with Section 40 (1-3) of the Mental Health Care Act (MHCA) No 17 of 2002, viz.handing over custody by the South African Police Service (SAPS) of suspected mentally ill patients to medical services at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (CHBH).Methods.The study was a retrospective record review of patients who were 18 y

Administrative Court is a specialized court under the Supreme Court with a role to settle the administrative disputes included staffing disputes.The legitimation of Law No.30 of 2104 concerning Government Administration has brought a new paradigm in the governance framework.Also, the competence of the Court Hand is broader than before.In Addition,

Sang Joon An,1 Jong-Uk Mun,2 Keum Nae Kang,3 Young Uk Kim4 1Department of Neurology, Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, International St Mary’s Hospital, Incheon, Korea; 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Changwon Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Changwon, Korea; 3Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Abstract Background Pseudo-phenotypes, such as 305-day yields, estimated breeding values or deregressed proofs, are usually used as response variables for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of milk production traits in dairy cattle.Computational inefficiency challenges the direct use of test-day records for longitudinal GWAS with large datasets